elaiyam
10-08 08:12 AM
Yes.. you can.
wallpaper Mob.Wives.
Prancer
04-08 07:27 PM
Ok, I made another one :thumb:
In edit above.
In edit above.
eager_immi
07-18 03:47 PM
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
2011 tattoo makeup drita mob wives
masti_Gai
09-25 03:31 PM
NOTANYMORE
after bi-specialization of centers
140 is taking more time.
I filed 140 in May second week
no response yet:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
after bi-specialization of centers
140 is taking more time.
I filed 140 in May second week
no response yet:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
more...
mnkaushik
02-09 03:36 PM
My Lawyer said the same thing. If you say the minimum requirement for a particular job is Bachelors + 5years of exp then every person hired for that position in the past should have Bachelors + 5yrs of exp.
EkAurAaya
05-25 12:47 PM
Guys as the administrator (pappu) pointed out... we really need to be short and sweet and to the point... mixing issues will only create confusion and we will all look unorganized...
***admin's I used your template but tried to add some more personal touch to express what we all are dealing with, hope it's ok:
When you call stick to something as simple as:
My name is ____ and I am calling from [city], in the state of [State]. I am a member of a group called Immigration Voice – that represents LEGAL skilled immigrants.
I've been patiently waiting for ___ Years for my green card now, I came here legally and have always followed all laws of this land... I'm really disappointed and disheartened by what I see and read about the immigration reform bill.
All I ask is... (discuss all 3 issues or even 1 that you think will keep it simple and get your point across)
1) INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants who are currently backlogged. We request the Senate to ELIMINATE the backlogs BEFORE starting a new merits based system.
2) Urge the Senator to AMEND section 501(b) and INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants from 140,000 to a higher number to ELIMINATE the current backlogs, the SAME way the bill REDUCES backlogs for family-based immigrants in section 501(a).
3) Oppose the senate’s immigration bill in its current form because it reduces the number of green cards for legal skilled immigrants. It diverts these green cards to the proposed future guest worker program and to a proposed untested merits based system.
***admin's I used your template but tried to add some more personal touch to express what we all are dealing with, hope it's ok:
When you call stick to something as simple as:
My name is ____ and I am calling from [city], in the state of [State]. I am a member of a group called Immigration Voice – that represents LEGAL skilled immigrants.
I've been patiently waiting for ___ Years for my green card now, I came here legally and have always followed all laws of this land... I'm really disappointed and disheartened by what I see and read about the immigration reform bill.
All I ask is... (discuss all 3 issues or even 1 that you think will keep it simple and get your point across)
1) INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants who are currently backlogged. We request the Senate to ELIMINATE the backlogs BEFORE starting a new merits based system.
2) Urge the Senator to AMEND section 501(b) and INCREASE the number of EMPLOYMENT-BASED green cards for LEGAL skilled immigrants from 140,000 to a higher number to ELIMINATE the current backlogs, the SAME way the bill REDUCES backlogs for family-based immigrants in section 501(a).
3) Oppose the senate’s immigration bill in its current form because it reduces the number of green cards for legal skilled immigrants. It diverts these green cards to the proposed future guest worker program and to a proposed untested merits based system.
more...
ramus
07-05 02:09 PM
Here is media thread..
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5994
I am keep asking every member to spend 15 mins to find out right thread before opening new thread.. Its very difficult to keep track of every thread..
Please post any media related post on http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5994
Thanks.. Hope you understand.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5994
I am keep asking every member to spend 15 mins to find out right thread before opening new thread.. Its very difficult to keep track of every thread..
Please post any media related post on http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5994
Thanks.. Hope you understand.
2010 Finale / Mob Wives
go_guy123
10-01 02:02 PM
Yesterday there was a post made which I commented.
Today i see this post on ilw.com
Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy: MALDEF HEAD: DON'T BLOCK PIECEMEAL IMMIGRATION REFORM IF COMPREHENSIVE FAILS (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/maldef-head-dont-block-piecemeal-immigration-reform-if-comprehensive-fails.html)
On the whole Greg Siskind is a lawyer who is knowledgeable about political dynamics.
I always follow his articles.
I always felt that CIR was a impossible strategy. It bundles all the immigration bill in one single bill. The idea is that it would make the illegal legalization process more easier than in a piecemeal strategy where the easily passable ones like SKIL bill etc might pass leaving behind the more politically toxic rest.
Also what it does that it makes the CIR an isolated elephant which is hunted down by
a pack of wolves , in other words uniting the antis into one single consolidated powerful force.
Eventually the MALDEF head is realizing the folly of the logic and I feel in a Year or two CIR strategy will be abandoned for a piecemeal strategy.
Today i see this post on ilw.com
Greg Siskind on Immigration Law and Policy: MALDEF HEAD: DON'T BLOCK PIECEMEAL IMMIGRATION REFORM IF COMPREHENSIVE FAILS (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/maldef-head-dont-block-piecemeal-immigration-reform-if-comprehensive-fails.html)
On the whole Greg Siskind is a lawyer who is knowledgeable about political dynamics.
I always follow his articles.
I always felt that CIR was a impossible strategy. It bundles all the immigration bill in one single bill. The idea is that it would make the illegal legalization process more easier than in a piecemeal strategy where the easily passable ones like SKIL bill etc might pass leaving behind the more politically toxic rest.
Also what it does that it makes the CIR an isolated elephant which is hunted down by
a pack of wolves , in other words uniting the antis into one single consolidated powerful force.
Eventually the MALDEF head is realizing the folly of the logic and I feel in a Year or two CIR strategy will be abandoned for a piecemeal strategy.
more...
larmani
09-28 07:32 PM
Mine was approved after 2 weeks and it was premium processing(approved on July 12th)
hair hairstyles Mob Wives star
permfiling
05-18 05:42 PM
If you haven't filed I-485 yet, you cannot use AC21 as it requires I-485 to be pending for more than 180 days. It means, that you're stuck with your ex-employer for GC processing unless your new employer is willing to file new LC and I-140 for you. You can port the PD of your approved I-140 to the new one.
Once your PD becomes current, then you can file I-485.
I think you got my question differently. My ex-employer is A where I had my I140 approved . Now I am with employer B. If i want to continue with B then I have to file LC+140 with old PD but if I go back to A in same role then I have to file only 485 but my LCA is specific to location in CA .My question is wether I join A in NY and still file AOS based on old PD or not.
Once your PD becomes current, then you can file I-485.
I think you got my question differently. My ex-employer is A where I had my I140 approved . Now I am with employer B. If i want to continue with B then I have to file LC+140 with old PD but if I go back to A in same role then I have to file only 485 but my LCA is specific to location in CA .My question is wether I join A in NY and still file AOS based on old PD or not.
more...
EB3gcwanted
07-31 02:50 PM
Hi,
I am currently working on EAD, having invoked AC21 once in the past. My labor was filed in 2005 under EB3 (I was eligible for EB2, but my company filed it under EB3, as per their policy). I filed 485 during July 2007 fiasco and am currently working on EAD.
My job qualifies for EB1 now and few of my peers have got Green Card under EB1. Can I port my filing from EB3 to EB1? Would it be better to do it with current employer or with a new employer? Pl. advice.
Thanks
I am currently working on EAD, having invoked AC21 once in the past. My labor was filed in 2005 under EB3 (I was eligible for EB2, but my company filed it under EB3, as per their policy). I filed 485 during July 2007 fiasco and am currently working on EAD.
My job qualifies for EB1 now and few of my peers have got Green Card under EB1. Can I port my filing from EB3 to EB1? Would it be better to do it with current employer or with a new employer? Pl. advice.
Thanks
hot asking the two Mob Wives
cowboyqb
05-06 08:52 PM
You are talking about new 140....my question is for 140 transfers.
more...
house tattoo 2011 drita mob wives
priyasagiraju
04-07 03:19 PM
Iam on L2 and working on my EAD which is expiring on april 29 th 2011.
I have applied for H1 in the 2010 quota but due to my employers mistake i got a rejection on that.
we are trying to reappeal to USCIS but iam not sure if its going to work.
Suppose i have a project and apply again for 2011 quota , can i still continue working even if my EAD expires.
They say that we actually move to H1 on October , so if i apply before end of April through premium processing and get an approval notice before October can i continue working or start work right away or do i have to wait till October.
Is there a possibility to start working immediately as soon as my H1 gets approved or do we have to wait until October in any case.
Thanks in advance
I have applied for H1 in the 2010 quota but due to my employers mistake i got a rejection on that.
we are trying to reappeal to USCIS but iam not sure if its going to work.
Suppose i have a project and apply again for 2011 quota , can i still continue working even if my EAD expires.
They say that we actually move to H1 on October , so if i apply before end of April through premium processing and get an approval notice before October can i continue working or start work right away or do i have to wait till October.
Is there a possibility to start working immediately as soon as my H1 gets approved or do we have to wait until October in any case.
Thanks in advance
tattoo 2010 drita mob wives quotes.
cherl
05-07 09:01 PM
Dear friends,
I got my NIW I-140 approved on March, 2009. The priority date indicated on my I-140 approval letter is August, 2008. So I can't submit my I-485 yet since the visa bulletin is not current. Is that correct?
My question is: Can I accept a job abroad and work aborad while I'm waiting for the visa bulletin to become current?
Thanks a million for your help on this.
I got my NIW I-140 approved on March, 2009. The priority date indicated on my I-140 approval letter is August, 2008. So I can't submit my I-485 yet since the visa bulletin is not current. Is that correct?
My question is: Can I accept a job abroad and work aborad while I'm waiting for the visa bulletin to become current?
Thanks a million for your help on this.
more...
pictures images mob wives drita mob
GC_ki_daud
08-21 11:31 AM
Or they dont care about Processing dates just like they dont care much about increasing their work speed
dresses tattoo quotes mob wives tv
Z.Liu
02-23 01:46 PM
Hi, guys,
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
I'm having a little trouble with counting the years of experience for my EB2 petition. My attorney said I can only count the number of years I worked before joining the current sponsoring company!! The situation is, I jointed this company in Jan 2004. But my petition (Labor) appliction only started at the end of 2006. My attorney says that the three years of working experience (04, 05 & 06) can not be counted!
Is he correct on this?
thanks.
more...
makeup makeup mob wives plastic
shae marks
05-31 09:41 PM
Hi Immigration Gurus,
I have a valid H1B Visa which is expiring on Feb 16th, 2008 and my old H1 is expiring the same day as my Visa. I applied for my H1B extension my H1 extension is pending. I am planning to go to india on Dec last week and coming back on jan 7th.
1) Can I travel without any problems/
2) While coming back, what are the documents I need to show, will my old H1 is enough or do I have to show receipt of showing I applied for extension?
I really appreciate your time and advice, advanced thanks
I have a valid H1B Visa which is expiring on Feb 16th, 2008 and my old H1 is expiring the same day as my Visa. I applied for my H1B extension my H1 extension is pending. I am planning to go to india on Dec last week and coming back on jan 7th.
1) Can I travel without any problems/
2) While coming back, what are the documents I need to show, will my old H1 is enough or do I have to show receipt of showing I applied for extension?
I really appreciate your time and advice, advanced thanks
girlfriend mob wives full episodes mob
gcpower1
01-27 07:11 PM
you are breave enough to fight 221g....
Welcome to USA after looking all this mass you still want to came to USA....
Welcome to USA after looking all this mass you still want to came to USA....
hairstyles Mob Wives – S1E8 – Best Quotes
GCard_Dream
01-26 04:33 PM
Looks like the long awaited spending bill is finally in the making and should make its way to the congress soon. For those of you who haven't contributed to IV, this should come as a warning that if you don't contribute now, it may just be too late for us to seek any relief in these bills.
Once this opportunity has passed, we'll be stuck with CIR which everyone knows is a tough pill to swallow for either party in the congress and could drag on for months and may never see the light of the day. So here are the choices:
1. Contribute now and try to get some relief from these spending bills.
2. Contribute later and try to get something done with CIR/SKIL.
3. Never contribute and just watch core members pull their hair trying to figure out why people are not contributing and just hope that GC will fall from sky.
Whatever you chose to do, please think twice before you make up your mind.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_go_co/spending_winners_and_losers
Once this opportunity has passed, we'll be stuck with CIR which everyone knows is a tough pill to swallow for either party in the congress and could drag on for months and may never see the light of the day. So here are the choices:
1. Contribute now and try to get some relief from these spending bills.
2. Contribute later and try to get something done with CIR/SKIL.
3. Never contribute and just watch core members pull their hair trying to figure out why people are not contributing and just hope that GC will fall from sky.
Whatever you chose to do, please think twice before you make up your mind.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070126/ap_on_go_co/spending_winners_and_losers
gctoget
08-14 02:48 PM
yes
fall1998
05-18 12:06 PM
Yepp, many companies have regulation not to release copy of I-140 to applicant unless applicant is leaving them.
No comments:
Post a Comment